Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316.2/25054
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorReis, José-
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-12T14:51:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-04T10:24:50Z-
dc.date.available2013-07-12T14:51:34Z
dc.date.available2020-10-04T10:24:50Z-
dc.date.issued1998-
dc.identifier.issn2183-203X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316.2/25054-
dc.description.abstractDiscutem-se neste texto as contribuições das duas grandes escolas que estabeleceram a visão institucionalista da economia. Mostra-se como elas representam paradigmas radicalmente distintos e, por isso, manifesta-se uma acentuada cumplicidade com a dissidência evolucionista iniciada com Veblen, que valoriza a incerteza e relaciona a economia com o processo da vida. É esta marca originária do institucionalismo, mais que a perspectiva do novo institucionalismo de Coase, North ou Williamson, que merece ser trazida para uma apreciação dos processos económicos contemporâneos. Por isso se considera que uma agenda de investigação actual deve convocar três pólos de debate: os problemas da contingência e da incerteza (a economia é a disciplina da complexidade); os problemas da interpretação dos comportamentos dinâmicos (a economia é a disciplina das instituições e da evolução); os problemas da reconstrução das contextualidades (a economia é a disciplina da regulação e da organização).por
dc.description.abstractDans ce texte, sont analysées les contributions apportées par les deux grandes écoles qui ont établi la vision institutionnaliste de l’économie. On y apporte la preuve que ces deux écoles représentent des paradigmes radicalement opposés et, c’est la raison pour laquelle on ne cache pas une complicité marquée avec la dissidence évolutionniste amorcée par Veblen, laquelle valorise l’incertitude et place l’économie en parallèle avec le processus de la vie. C’est cette vision originaire de Pinstitutionnalisme, davantage que la perspective du nouvel institutionnalisme de Coase, North ou Williamson, qu’il convient de prendre en considération afin d’apprécier les processus économiques contemporains. Aussi considèreton que tout programme actuel de recherche doit comporter trois pôles de débat: tout d’abord, les problèmes de la contingence et de l’incertitude (l’économie est la discipline de la complexité); ensuite, les problèmes de l’interprétation des comportements dynamiques (l’économie est la discipline des institutions et de l’évolution); enfin, les problèmes de la reconstruction des contextualités (l’économie est la discipline de la régulation et de l’organisation).fra
dc.description.abstractThis text analyses the contributions of the two major economic schools responsible for bringing the institutionalist view into economic thought. Their radically different paradigms show strong complicity with the evolutionary dissidence originated in Veblen’s works, which valorised uncertainty and linked the economic process with life itself. It is this original hallmark of institutionalism, rather than the new institutionalism by Coase, North or Williamson, that deserves to be brought under analysis in an attempt to reach a better understanding of the ongoing economic processes. According to the author, a new research agenda must ponder three different aspects: the problems concerning contingency and uncertainty (economics is the discipline of complexity); the problems concerning the interpretation of dynamic behaviour (economics is the discipline of institutions and evolution); and the problems concerning the reconstruction of contexts (economics is the discipline of regulation and organisation).eng
dc.language.isopor-
dc.publisherFaculdade de Economia da Universidade de Coimbra-
dc.titleO institucionalismo económico: crónica sobre os saberes da economiapor
dc.typearticle-
uc.publication.collectionNotas Económicas nº 11-
uc.publication.firstPage130-
uc.publication.issue11-
uc.publication.lastPage149-
uc.publication.locationCoimbra-
uc.publication.journalTitleNotas Económicas-
uc.publication.sectionArtigos-
uc.publication.orderno8-
uc.publication.areaCiências Sociais-
uc.publication.manifesthttps://dl.uc.pt/json/iiif/10316.2/25054/266270/manifest?manifest=/json/iiif/10316.2/25054/266270/manifest-
uc.publication.thumbnailhttps://dl.uc.pt/retrieve/12112938-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Notas Económicas
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
notaseconomicas11_artigo8.pdf1.71 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
  
See online
Show simple item record

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.